FlexPetz: Topic of the Week

Remember that post I wrote back in May 2007 about the rent-a-pet? It was a brief mention and now the fur is flying over the topic. I’d suggest you take a gander at Pet Connection, and this article CEO With Sordid Past Behind Flexpetz Dog Sharing Service along with Is Rent-A-Dog A Good Idea?.

The current sheltering situations of many facilities is dismal at best and at first glance I thought maybe the dog sharing service might be the first step into searching for an alternative. All professionals had concerns but change often rears its head in an odd fashion.

Some years ago I donated a program I developed to the American Humane Association and Animal Behavior and Training Associates designed to improve the lives of captive shelter animals. Why would I give a program away? Because they had the numbers and influence to take it to the field.

One of the activities was getting trainers and volunteers into the shelters to mentally stimulate the dogs and extinguish poor behavior unknowingly reinforced on a daily basis. I know that some of those tips and hints were taken out into the shelters–but change is slow in the world of pet ownership, fostering, and rescue.

You already know my opinion on this. Most of the pet problems that exist in the United States today are pet parenting education issues. It always goes back to that. Until the masses are educated on the selection and commitment to pets (and held accountable for it) there will not be significant changes. Animals require time and commitment but people are looking for the easy way and one that doesn’t take too much time and so the rent-a-dog follows the latch-key dog…

Until we change how we deal and manage animals we are going to see the same old things. Just this week backyard breeders showed up here in the mountains with their puppies. They set up camp in the parking lot of our two main shopping centers to sell them. If you have the money, you can get one. No questions asked, no commitment stressed, no continued breeder to pet owner education.

The breeders show up several times a year which means they excessively breed their animals. My guess is that many will end up in the backyard, or into an agency, when they outgrow the cuteness of puppyhood because they require too much time and energy to mold into good canine citizens–and who knows what will happen to the breeding animals when they cease to produce.

Okay, I’ll stop…

Anyway back to the FlexPetz, this press release was released by the HSUS and although I’ve worked alongside HSUS and other agencies doing disaster rescue, I have always discouraged people from sending money to the organizations that maintain heavy administrative and advertising costs.

Granted everyone has their role in catalyzing change but it is really much nicer when the money goes directly to the animals and the agencies deliver what they say they will.

So, this commentary commentary at Itchmo on HSUS and this one at Terrierman were interesting finds (thanks to Pet Connection again) as I had not heard about the call for investigation.

There are a ton of articles such as this one on FlexPetz and I’d be interested in your opinion.

Captive Wildlife: Mixed Messages?

This week I accompanied a bunch of animal lovers to visit a wildlife sanctuary,—one that does rehabilitation but that also provides educational programs to the public using animals that cannot be released due to permanent injuries or habituation to humans (in some cases imprinting).

Upon entry, things looked good, the place was clean, the enclosures secure, and the volunteers were hardworking and caring people–but during the course of the afternoon I became more and more mortified.

Good grief—here they were preaching that wild animals don’t make good pets and then entering into the enclosures and acting like they were pets—colorful leashes, toys, and other trends of behavior interactions. Don’t get me wrong, enrichment and stimulation is good but it was HOW they did it.

The birds of prey were allowed to grab with their beaks and one was cuddled like a stuffed animal. A young wild canine was allowed to jump and ricochet off of the body of the “handler” an allowed to nip and grab food from her hands.

Worse were my observations of the animals getting more and more agitated while the humans didn’t really notice. About three minutes before a minor incident in the bear enclosure—which was fortunately mitigated—I could see the issue escalating again.
Then I watched as another volunteer allowed a small wild cat to escalate in his behavior to the point of biting AND actually allowing it. I saw the big bruise on her upper arm from a bite during the previous day and suspect it is only a matter of time before someone gets seriously hurt.

Did I mention I used to be the president and active worker at a wildlife care and rehabilitation center…what I witnessed made me cringe.

My point here is that the interactions with the animals overshadowed their message of why wildlife don’t make good pets. I was disappointed that they didn’t really talk about their rehabilitation work or what is involved in it.

Not all animal handlers and workers are versed in animal training and safety…which is why you see the news with so many captive wildlife incidents. Although I believe that creating an interest and showing that animals can amiable to humans, my concerns are over how it is done.

What do you think when you witness animal interactions?