Animal Training Sense or Senseless?

Ark Lady with Clouded Leopard (about ten years ago)

Ark Lady with Clouded Leopard in years past...

One of the interesting trends that I’ve noticed over the years is how some animal trainers have good sense while others who want to train are senseless.

What do I mean by that?

Consider this question, “I am looking for someone who has trained ‘insert species or breed here’ because I need to know how to train one.”

Puh-lease!

I think this type of thinking gets people into that “us and them” mentality because they think they can only talk to others who are working with the same species or breed.

Honestly, each field of animal training operates in its own world.

Marine mammal trainers, primatologists, dog trainers, horse trainers, etc., all tend to group together. This means that some fields of animal training are slow to adapt to strategies and tools that early adopters in other animal managment fields grasped years ahead of some of the others.

My belief is that any animal trainer worth their salt can train just about anything.

Don’t believe me?

People are training fish, reptiles, birds, mammals of all types and they don’t need to converse with others to do it.

Now, I do have to say that there are two sides to this training coin:

  1. Training theory and strategies remain the same for ALL animals, if you know how to train using these tools it doesn’t matter what species (or breed) you are working with.
  2. When training a particular species or breed of animal, it is helpful to understand the biology and species specific (or breed specific) traits.

In all my years training, I’ve found that knowing the natural history of an animal (how they live, if it is a predator or prey species, if its social structure includes others or if it is solitary, etc.,) helps me in my work–but I never have found I had to work with that particular species prior to training one.

Yes, I would prefer to observe or be around the species or breed but it isn’t vital to my work.

Okay, okay, I know you are going to argue that training and Afghan hound is different from training a Labrador retriever–but so is training a dog from working stock versus training a dog bred by a novice hobbyist.

And working with a Ragdoll differs from working with a tabby of unknown origin.

So, while it helps to understand and be familiar with the nuances of a breed or species, it isn’t always critical or even necessary. (The exception might be when you get into behavioral problems of a domesticated animal…but I digress.)

For instance, the first time I trained a giraffe I knew that there would be some logistical problems just based on the height and movements of the animals but I didn’t have to interview a lot of people to do it or to “get that” piece.

When you develop your animal sense, you look at an animal and its predispositions and work your training strategy from that perspective.

In some cases, such as a consult I did with a Clouded Leopard, I talked to the “queen” of the species because I wanted all the data I could collect.

I wanted to dig deeper into the species and very subtle nuances.

Now, in addition to training skill and research into the animal and its natural predispositions, I’ve also been using a strategy that I outlined in, What Animals Can Teach Us about Spirituality.

Don’t let the title mislead you, the book delves into animal influences and talks a lot about training (plus some more esoteric questions) but the social styles, or the trends that I identify as to how animals relate to the world is another critical piece I think most people miss.

Social styles are how an organism relates to the world. In the human realm most people know about the Myers-Briggs or Keirsey Temperament models.

Over the years, I’ve seen the same trends in animals (across different species) and first published my thoughts in the early 1990s.

I got a lot of grief for it but Pavlov noted some of those trends in the early 1900s.

So much for being a trendsetter!

Anyway, if you add that aspect to your training strategies and understanding of the species, it give you a triangle that forms a solid three-tiered approach to working with any animal.

So, I don’t believe all trainers are equal when it comes to how they work. Some treat all animals the same–I don’t believe that ultimately pays off and is senseless.

Good animal training sense starts with observation and is highlighted by a skill set that is developed and incorporates different considerations prior to and during actual training.

Okay, your turn to chime in. What do you think?

Animal Training Career Risks: Emotional Attachments

animal career risks-compassion fatigue

Can you withstand the emotional pain from an animal training career or any other career with animals?

Wow, I must be hitting a cord with you because the comments are stacking up quickly!

Kate, one of my valued subscribers, left a really great question in the comments. It was so great that I dropped everything to answer it here on the blog.

(If you are not a subscriber yet, sign up to the right. Subscribers always get first priority and attention when it comes to topics and questions.)

Kate wrote:

I really am not sure about this path. I never went into it because I was ‘afraid’ I couldn’t get beyond emotional attachment. I’d like to read an article about how you handle that when training animals. Does one need to prepare to put up a shield and detach themselves from an emotional connection with the animal?

Kate, I have to say that this is one of those questions that causes a lot of debate not only in the animal training world, but in the animal career world in general.

Let me build a little bit of a foundation before I get into my answer to your question.

In the Ark Lady’s world, animal training is an art and a science.

Good trainers use the latest scientific advancements and discoveries to morph their behavior modification and training techniques and the industry moves forward as a consequence.

But, exceptional animal training is an art, it requires response to the animal and its emotions (yes, I said it–keep listening and pitch a fit later) and physical state.

It also is an intuitive response that knows the nuances of the species and the individual animal.

If you boiled the world down into black and white, it is possible to group animal trainers (or humans that do behavior modification) into two groups–the academics and the streetwise.

Now that might not sound very scientific but it is understandable, let me explain what I mean.

The academics rely on the scientific model and discount anything that cannot be succinctly and accurately described.

Steetwise trainers tend to go with what their gut is telling them and don’t tend to dismiss anecdotal suppositions.

Now ideally, a good animal trainer is a blend of the two.

I believe you need to be both streetwise and scientific to be a good, solid professional animal trainer. Which is also why I call animal training and art and a science.

The art form is something that each individual brings to the forefront of their consultations and training while the science part is truly understanding the methodology of behavior modification and the contributing factors to any issues, or to solving those issues.

Hopefully, you are still with me.

Okay, there are some that believe you should take out the emotion when working with any animal.

This is why markers (clicker, light, whistle) are preferred to voice. Why?

  • Because the the voice inflection can influence an animal’s behavior and convey the emotional state of the trainer, and
  • because you can suppress or alter the animal’s behavior if you respond emotionally.

However, we are not automatons and so emotion is part of the equation in a lot of situations. I don’t believe the human condition can omit emotion in most circumstances.

Now, the theory is that if you take out the emotion, the animal will respond to everyone who is training equally.

I say, bulls**t.

It might sound good for those in a lab or controlled circumstances, but in the real world I’d like to see some evidence that this is true.

I could be wrong but I’ve seen it over and over again in training situations–where it is the relationship of trust and the human-animal bond that influences the animal.

What makes one trainer better than the other? I think it is the connection to another living creature.

Now, having said that, it can work against you.

For instance, like my rat who froze up because he was picking up on my emotional state during a performance versus the one who had no bond with me and who performed his behaviors when asked.

But, when I’ve been working animals in tight situations, it has been my relationship with them (and savvy) that has usually prevented an incident from occurring.

Okay, I’d really like to hear your opinions and experiences on this but first…

In the animal field their is a term called “compassion fatigue” which can contribute to burn out and to desensitization to certain situations.

When I had to kill animals to feed predators, a desensitization had been built up to it because it was necessary to keep them alive. Today you can get prepped diets for many carnivores, birds of prey, and reptiles but “back in the day” we had to feed whole animals and sometimes this required that we had to dispatch them.

One day still sticks in my mind, some students under my tutelage cried when they had to take such actions, it was necessary to maintain the animals in our care but they had not become desensitized to it.

So, that was part of our role as animal trainers and caretakers, but there are other animal careers where the compassion fatigue takes a toll on employees.

Believe it or not, I had a hard time with compassion fatigue when I worked as an adoption counselor.

I suffered from compassion fatigue because I witnessed a lot of cruelty from humans discarding animals just because those animals were not convenient (and other reasons).

It was hard for me to see those animals suffering from the loss and grief of separation while new homes were sought.

Anyway, my point is that you might do well in some careers with animals versus other animal jobs when it comes to your emotions.

As I mentioned, I could quickly dispatch an animal to feed another but not bear to watch animals suffer longterm because of the lack of commitment from humans who were suppose to be caretakers.

Now, another issue has to do with the emotional state of an animal trainer, it has to do with how invested you become with the animals in your charge.

First, usually they don’t belong to you.

Second, sh** happens.

I remember being punished by the director of a facility I was associated with.

The animal in my charge blossomed under my tutelage and when he pulled me from my assignment it was like sticking a knife in my heart.

As for the animal, she persevered, as they all do.

She also greeted me affectionately over the next twenty-some-odd years when our paths crossed again…and she was not the only animal to do so.

In other circumstances, moving on can be a crushing blow because  you leave animals you love behind.

Then there are those that might be jealous of the relationships you have with your charges–another complication that can get in the way and cause grief.

So, I’ve given you some things to ponder, but to answer your question.

I think animals catalyze and allow people to go very deep emotionally and that the attachment and depth is way beyond what some people can do with other humans.

It is scary, it can be painful–but it can also be rewarding beyond your wildest dreams.

Ultimately, you have to decide if it is something you can dare to do and only you can answer that question for yourself.

Now it is your turn, share your story, share your thoughts in the comments.