The problem is that many agencies only believe that there are only two ways to dissuade wildlife from invading. Deer control can be achieved through not only fencing programs or habitat modifications but through landscaping consultation and modifications, topical or barrier deterrents, livestock or cattle guards, motion activated lights or water jets, and as a final attempt the dreaded depredation permit shooting and relocation programs.

Guess I had better add this to the list of article ideas you give me…

We love the wildlife, but the deer are so abundant that gardens and even trees are being eaten away, to the point that a councilman proposed allowing archery hunting within city limits.

It’s a contentious issue. Initially I spoke out against the idea since deer overpopulation is a statewide problem, not a local one that we can solve in isolation. However, every study I’ve read concludes that there are two ways to control deer: fence them out or kill them. Other methods don’t seem to work.

What’s difficult is finding that balance between wildlife and city life.

We’re still debating the topic within the community and it’ll be interesting to see how it turns out.